CAT
IN THE BRAIN
DVD
Region 0. Hardgore / Screen Entertainment
Censorship
is an arse, and if you needed proof of that, here's a shiny
new DVD of Lucio Fulci's gorefest Cat in the Brain (aka
Nightmare Concert) for you. This film was sent packing
when first submitted to the British censors three or four years
ago, apparently being so depraved that no amount of cuts could
make it acceptable for public consumption. Yet here we are in
2003 and the film was been passed, uncut. Now, can someone please
explain how society has changed to make a highly dangerous movie
perfectly innocuous in just a few years? C'mon BBFC, we're waiting...
Not
that this is the extreme movie it's made out to be. Gory, yes,
but also so ridiculously camp and cartoonish that you wonder
just what sort of humourless idiot would have ever considered
it a threat to society. The film itself is a plotless, messy,
very silly mish-mash of splatter footage, mostly cobbled together
from unreleased (and unreleasable) clunkers like Touch of
Death, Sodom's Ghosts (both by Fulci),
La Porte d'Inferno, Massacre, The
Murder Secret, Bloody Psycho and Bloody
Moon (not the Jess Franco laugh-riot). Holding all this
together is a mad story involving Fulci playing himself - a
film director haunted by visions of violence and horror. He
seeks psychiatric help, but his shrink is far more interested
in using Fulci's nightmares as an excuse to carry out a series
of murders, convincing the disturbed movie-maker that he himself
is the actual culprit.
So,
clearly nonsense of the highest calibre. But if you enjoy Eurotrash
cinema and are prepared to switch off your brain, this might
pass by fairly painlessly. Gorehounds will be delighted with
it, and it'll probably be a great party movie. But by any conventional
standards, this is terrible.
Amusingly,
Fulci and his apologists have long asserted that Wes Craven
stole the concept of this movie for his New Nightmare
movie, where he played a director haunted by his own creation.
Such claims are truly laughable: I doubt if Craven even knew
who Fulci was, let alone had see this movie, and the fiction-blurred-with-reality
concept had been used by better directors than Fulci before.
And of course, for all it's many faults, Craven's film was a
provocative, intelligent piece of work: even the most ardent
Fulcit might have a hard time making that argument for this
film.
Still,
some people are too obsessed with their love of wilfully obscure
culture to ever give credit to the mainstream...
DAVID
FLINT
BUY
IT NOW (UK)